Audio and Video Tech from an AV Geek 

formats

A DIY $86 Fluorescent Light Source

Published on May 16, 2013 by in lighting

If you’re not familiar with the Indy Mogul folks, and you shoot video, you probably should be.  They have some great ideas for DIY solutions.  More often than not, money saving ones at that.  You can spend a bundle on lighting solutions, as I have over the years.  Fluorescent lamps have become the preferred source these days.  Gone are the old fashioned flickering green tinted lamps of a bygone era.  Modern CFl lamps can be purchased in different color temperatures to suit your needs, and won’t heat up a room like halogens or incandescent bulbs.

Check out this clever build.

 
Tags:
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

File Sharing For Photographers & Videographers

iStock_media file folder

Advanced file sharing is a hot topic these days, and we tend to hear about it most frequently with regard to online communications in the business world. Indeed, professional industries of all kinds have a wide variety of reasons to seek out the numerous benefits of advanced file sharing. However, that doesn’t mean that these technologies are only useful on ordinary business environments.

One great alternative example of a more unique and specific use for advanced file sharing is in hobbies and professions involving photos, videos, and digital editing. Photographers and videographers, too, are conducting more and more work online, and for that reason they can certainly make use of multiple benefits typical of file sharing services. For example, consider the following features offered by Share File, a popular service provider that allows users to send big files in secure and convenient ways.

Sharing Complex Files

The key benefit of any advanced file sharing service is the ability to easily send and receive large and complex files, and for photographers and videographers this is particularly relevant. Often, video files and photo libraries exceed the data allowed in ordinary email services. So, naturally, enhanced capability for file transfer allows videographers and photographers to more easily send files between one another, with clients, and with editors.

Keeping File Transfer Secure

Security benefits are also significant features in advanced file transfer systems, and certainly can’t hurt for photographers or videographers. Particularly in dealing with direct communications with clients, it’s nice to know that there is security surrounding file transfers. Additionally, important video and photo files can be backed up and secured more effectively through the off-site data centres utilized by providers like Share File.

Desktop Widgets & Apps

With an advanced file sharing system in place, you can also implement easy-to-use desktop widgets and apps that make communications and storage incredibly simple. Often, when receiving a photo or video file in ordinary email, one must go through the steps of opening the email, downloading the file, and opening it in a separate program. With these apps and widgets, however, you can receive and observe these files without ever opening a single program.

General Organization

Naturally all of the above listed features and benefits enhance organizational capability and efficiency. More specifically, however, file sharing services can be used to help you to organize your work projects completely separately from personal files or other projects. Keeping everything in personal email can quickly become cluttered, and it becomes easy to blend personal files with work projects. Keeping the two separate is far simpler with the advantages of advanced file sharing services.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Canon announces breakthrough 0.03 LUX Full Frame 35MM Video CMOS Sensor

Published on April 13, 2013 by in video

Man, I was annoyed when the T4i came out just after I had bought a T3i.  A mere pittance compared what those who just bought a full frame camera must feel.  This is just the nature of technology, and epescially a company like Canon.  Something better is always around the corner.

First of all, the sensor is only part of a prototype at the moment.  So, relax and save your pennies.  It will be a while yet.  I have to say though, after seeing the video, it looks so tantalizing I can darn near taste it!  I’m going to use incense exclusively for my lighting when I finally get my hands on one.

 

Sample Canon Still

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Hosting your website videos on Amazon S3

Published on April 10, 2013 by in web

After many headaches with my web hosting company, not the least of which trying to serve my video portfolio from their overloaded servers, I have since switched to Amazon S3.  This is one of Amazon’s numerous cloud services.  It might seem daunting at first, but it’s easier than you might thing.  And instead of just allowing progressive download of your video, it is actually streamed from their servers.  More in the video below.

 

 

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Magisto

Published on February 26, 2013 by in iPhone

This is a bit like Instagram for videos. That is, it allows easy enhancement if your videos after uploading to the site. Apps are available for both Android and IOS devices. I must say though, the automated editing and effects worked better than I had expected. Furthermore, the selection of stock music was a pleasant surprise, actually yielding some recognizable artists and songs. I’ve usually not very impressed by this sort of thing, but I must say, it’s well worth a go. What did I do as a quick test? A cat video of course!

Update 4.10.2013 – The cat you see in the video is our friend Gracie. She has been quite ill lately. As she is over 17 years old, this has been troubling to say the least. Please send her good thoughts.

 

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

A Digital Bolex?

Published on February 12, 2013 by in cameras

For those who may not know, like you folks who were born after the 8-Track tape left us, Bolex made some of the finest 8mm, and relatively affordable high quality 16mm film movie cameras of days past.  Many a short, and some actual independent films were shot with Bolex cameras.

Apparently, a kickstarter project is about to yield a modern day digital version.  What’s more, is that it actually looks the part.  Not sure how practical this makes it, but boy does it look kinda awesome or what?

Digital Bolex D16

Meet the Bolex D16 from Digital Bolex on Vimeo.

Digital Bolex: First Frames from Digital Bolex on Vimeo.

 
Tags:
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
2 Comments  comments 
formats

DIY HDTV antenna from a coat hanger

Published on January 18, 2013 by in video
DIY HDTV Antenna

My Own Attempt

I tried to watch a couple of YouTube videos on this subject, and just could not sit through them.  I know these folks meant well, but the videos were long and tedious, and the audio was darn near unlistenable.   The latter being a big pet peeve for me personally, as evidenced by some of the other articles on this site.

Another peeve, is the blatant misrepresentation of so called “HDTV” antennas by retailers.  Especially “amplified HDTV” antennas.  These pieces of junk often sell for $50 or more, and are often inferior to an old fashioned $7 set of “rabbit ears”.  Often looking like small squares, usually designed to be attached to a wall.  You can actually make your own antenna for a few bucks, and some scrap material.

HDTV broadcasts use some of the same frequencie spectrum as old fashioned analog television.  Ironically, or maybe not so much, some of the best antennas are very old designs.  Here’s a very nicely done PDF from the good folks at Make.  For those who don’t know about Make, you should check them out. 

DIY HDTV antenna from coat hangers.

 

 

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Microphones – What you need to know

Published on January 10, 2013 by in audio

I have read a ream of articles on microphones.  Many, if not most, end up sounding like promotional brochures.  More about reviewing and recommending brands, that instructing the reader.  I have used a myriad of microphones over the years.  I’ve also sold them for two retailers.  For those shooting video, using an external mic is probably the biggest improvement you can make.  Virtually all camcorders and DSLRs, have poor quality microphones.  Worse yet, most are built into the body of the unit, picking up both handling noises, and mechanical noises the device makes. There are a wide array of microphone designs available today.  For the purposes of recording audio for video, we can narrow it down to about three general types of microphones.  Your camera must of course offer the correct connection for the microphone you choose.  If it does not, there are devices to address this, but we won’t get into that here.

Hand Held Microphones

Handheld Microphone

On most any interview on TV, you will see a reporter holding a microphone up to the interview subject.  Hand held mics are ideal for this application.  You can use the very same mic used by performers, but most TV news production units use something a little different.  Performance microphones are usually somewhat directional, and are referred to as “cardiod” mics, due to their heart shaped pickup pattern.  For video, an omni directional mic is usually a better choice.  You can pick up both sides of the interview, without constantly moving the mic back and forth.

Lavaliere Microphones

wireless mic

Lavaliere mics, often referred to as “lapel” mics are very common in broadcasting.  Virtually every talk show, and news program use these. “Lav” mics are available in both wired and wireless versions.  The latter has obvious advantages.  If you’re on a budget, go with a good wired lav.  Don’t be swayed by cheap wireless rigs.  They are just not worth it.  A good wireless setup will easily cost you several hundred dollars, or more.  Another alternative is to simply rent a wireless system.  Most larger cities have rental houses that will provide these at a low rental fee.

Shotgun Mics

shotgun mic

A shotgun mic is designed to pick up sound in a very narrow pattern.  They reject sound from the sides, allowing a bit more “focus” on the sound in front of the mic.  In filmaking, these are used extensively.  Most often mounted on the end of a boom pole.  The boom may be held by an operator, or on a tripod mounted boom.  There are a number of shotgun mics designed for mounting directly on a video camera.  This style is often used by news camera operators.  The biggest mistake most newcomers make, and it is a big one, is thinking that buying a good shotgun is the complete solution for all sound capture.  It is not.  The common misconception is that they work just like a camera telephoto lens, allowing the same result from far away, as if you were up close with a conventional mic.  They do not.

The Bottom Line

The simple fact is, that an expensive microphone at a distance, will not come close to matching a cheap one placed close to the subject.  Yes, that $2000 shotgun you’ve seen online, placed across the room, will not hold a candle to a $39 mic placed close to the source.  The web is brimming with video that suffers from this common mistake.  Anything more than about six feet away or more, and no matter how fancy the shotgun, it will never match a cheap vocal or lav up close.  Again, our “cheap” mics in this example are wired.  Always avoid cheap wireless stuff.

 
Tags:
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
1 Comment  comments 
formats

Vimeo vs. YouTube

Published on December 26, 2012 by in online

    When you want to upload your video online YouTube and Vimeo come first in to your mind. Then a question occurs. Which one is the best? The answer depends on several facts.

    You are tired of seeing ads? Are the exactly suitable videos found in a search? Let’s see what gives the best result.

    No doubt that YouTube is the most popular host for online videos all over the world. It’s got 800 million visitors each month and 72 hours of video are uploaded every minute. But does that suggest Vimeo can’t compete with YouTube?  Absolutely the answer is No. Each of these has unique qualities that you have to consider when uploading your next video masterpiece.

YouTube

Pros:-

    If you want your video to be seen by large number of visitors, you definitely have to choose YouTube. With more than 800 million visitors each month, there is a big chance for you. And of course YouTube is owned by Google, therefore there is no risk of not finding your video in search results. Furthermore YouTube allow us unlimited uploads and to customize player backgrounds as well.

    If it’s about business purpose, YouTube allows ads in videos. You can even pay for promoted videos to make sure that your video is highly likely to be seen.

Cons:-

    With a large number of videos being uploaded every minute, there may be lot of junk in YouTube. It allows any user to upload; therefore it’s full of junk which may be a disturbance to the visitors. That gives minus points because most of the viewers do not like that. Advertising also detracts from the users experience on Youtube.

    Another limitation is that YouTube allow users to upload only 15 minutes videos.

Vimeo

Pros:-

    Vimeo has a much more arranged appearance and is easy to use because everything is organized and easily searchable. Video quality is also higher and there is no time limit for uploading videos.

Vimeo suits for a more professional audience as it filters the commercial videos, gaming videos and non-user generated content. The Vimeo community is engaged with much more supportive work and responses. And in the other hand, Vimeo allow users to upload their own thumbnail image to the video to represent the video and pro-users have opportunity to embed their logo or image directly on the player. It might be a good chance for branding.

Cons:-

    Vimeo’s popularity continued to grow every day, with around 60 million unique visitors in each month, but that’s not enough for challenge YouTube that’s for sure. It might be a satisfactory point to go with YouTube. Another disadvantage is Vimeo does not allow free users to upload more than one HD video per week and also does not offer fast upload speeds.

So, what do you think? You just have to relax and think a little bit on which one is the best for my necessity and goals.

    This comparison was brought to you by Man Made Media, a Denver animation and

Denver video production company in Colorado.  Please visit their website to learn more.

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
3 Comments  comments 
formats

Netflix Bests Starz in Bid for Disney Movies

Published on December 6, 2012 by in online

This is pretty big. In fact, It’s a huge move forward for streaming content vs. the old guard cable providers.  I predict that the rest will follow a bit sooner than later.  It’s a hopeful sign for those of us who want to choose what we watch, and not be forced to fund content that we do not want.

More at the Ny Times blog.

 

Streaming movie and TV

 

 

 
Tags:
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
© Copyright 2012 Pixelriffic Productions
credit