When RealNetworks Settled on DVD Copying, We All Lost – Boing Boing

A great article I just ran across on Boingboing, about the Real Networks DVD case.  If you aren’t aware of this blog with the funny name, you should be.  They produce some great content.  This is such a well written article on the subject of the RealDVD application.  In short, RealDVD would have allowed you to extract the contents of a DVD you already paid for, legally, and put the contents on your computer, or your iPod.  Unfortunately, they lost the court case.  Now, only criminals will have this privilege.

When RealNetworks Settled on DVD Copying, We All Lost – Boing Boing.

Leave the first comment

Adobe Flash, FLV and MP4

Adobe Flash

Adobe Flash

The iPad reminded me of the strange confusion around Adobe Flash.  Many were surprised that the iPad will not support flash.  I can’t say that I was surprised at all.  As many readers might know, the iPhone does not support flash.  There actually only a few smartphones that do support flash, and only do so to a limited extent.  Apple in particular, has a ax to grind with Adobe, as the flash player seems to occasionally cause system crashes in OSX.  Apple feels this is a problem with Adobe’s code.

There is however some confusion about a couple of important aspects of Flash.  What first comes to mind is the eye candy websites that use flash to animate all sorts of buttons and effects.  Some elegantly so, and others to a ridiculous extent.  Flash (and Shockwave) has been used to create many animated presentations, and applications and games as well.  There is however an almost completely separate function supported by flash player, and that is video playback.

Originally, the flash player was designed to play a particular video file format known as FLV.  This is a video file format specific to the Flash player.  For years, this has been the method of choice for delivering video on the web.  Youtube, and many similar sites, used this method for years.  It of course required that you have Adobe Flash player installed on your computer.  Most of you out there know all too well the prompt from your web browser, asking that you install the Flash Plugin.

There were many competitors over the years for alternate methods of online video delivery.  Windows Media, Apple Quicktime, Real Media, and so on.  A refreshingly new trend has however been afoot these past years, and that is the MP4 file format.  Also known as Mpeg4, this actually represents a bit of a convergence.  An odd thing indeed, when so many incompatible file formats and applications plague all things computerized these days.  Not only does Apple support Mp4, it’s actually the chosen video format of the iPhone, and iPod touch.  This was no doubt a factor that influenced the move towards mp4 video delivery that Youtube now embraces.

Where does Flash come in?  As it turns out, as of version 9, Adobe flash player supports playback of mp4 files via a web page.  The great thing about this is no additional plug-in is required to play the video.  That is, if you have flash player installed, and of course that your device supports flash.  While I do have some background in web development, I’m hardly a programmer.  I wonder why that mp4 video playback via the flash player can’t be supported alone, and simply disable all of the other Flash functionality?  Seems to me, this just throws the baby out with the bathwater.

Leave the first comment

The iPad commeth

The Apple iPad

The Apple iPad

I was actually quite surprised at all the criticism about the new iPad.  Overall, I really do think this will be the tablet computer that finally works.  It’s in many ways a scaled up iPod touch after all.  It is however a more powerful device.  This, and the large display, open up quite a few new possibilities.

Obviously, images and video will benefit from the large display.  Those who have seen it in person say the image quality is quite striking.  Most of you probably now know that Apple is entering the ebook business, and this will no doubt be a serious competitor to Kindle and the other readers out there.  Oh sure, epaper is supposedly easier on the eyes, but even if this is true, the trade-off is pretty compelling.

I, like just about everyone it would seem, do have a few nits to pick.  For one, I was really struck about the fact that the iPad omitted a camera.  Not so much a forward facing one to take pictures with, but a rear facing camera for Skype.  This would be a wonderful device for any sort of video chat for that matter.  My guess is that this was a cost issue.  I was pleasantly surprised at the relatively low price-point.  Now some commentators have claimed that Apple used about $270 worth of parts, therefore they still have quite a fat profit.  These folks unfortunately don’t understand the additional costs of putting such a device in your hand.

I was however a bit disappointed at the lack of a SD card slot.  Apple of course has never had such a feature on an iPod, as they felt the included memory was sufficient.  Besides, Steve hates unnecessary holes on his pretty devices!  In this case, it’s quite a different issue.  Not one of adding capacity, but a way to get your content into the device.  The iPad is clearly intended to be something more than a great big iPod.  It was designed to take the place of netbooks for one thing.  While Apple would prefer you only add content via iTunes, or a desktop computer, I still have some issue with this.  What a wonderful feature it would be to pull the card from your camera, then view and manipulate your photos on the iPad.  You can still do this of course, but you will need a SD card adapter.  The irony here is you’d need an ugly protruding dongle to upload your photos from your camera.  This would be a great field tool for professional photographers.  Sure, I doubt it will do RAW, but most finer cameras also can output a JPG version of the same shot for review.  Unfortunately, you’d need that ugly dongle.

That said, I cannot lie.  I can’t wait to have my very own iPad.

Leave the first comment

KI PRO – AJA Video – Affordable HDMI portable recorder?

AJA KiPRO HDMI Recorder

KI PRO - AJA Video

I would love to own this, and I bet every one of you would agree.  At least if we could afford it.  Now, I have no doubt that AJA gear is worth every penny.  They have a reputation that no doubt has taken years to earn.  You can also bet that this is as durable and reliable as any similar device.

The fact of the matter is, their ain’t many similar devices out there.  Certainly not near this price.  If all you need is a portable standard def recorder, they can be had for next to nothing.  Looking for something with a HDMI input?  That’ll cost you!  While I would never expect a device like the Ki-PRO to sell for a fraction of its price, I wonder why there are no lower priced HD recorders.  Specifically, a portable recorder that can record from an HDMI input.  One clue is that you can add a card to capture HDV or SD video to your computer via Firewire (IEEE 1394) for about $15.  Want to add an HDMI input to yer `puter?  It’ll cost you about $400 for a Blackmagic capture card.  Again, I don’t doubt the value and quality of Blackmagic products.  I just wonder what makes HDMI stuff so expensive.

Leave the first comment

YouTube – Fall Of The Republic 1/14: The Presidency Of Barack H Obama

The intent here is not necessarily to promote the views of Alex Jones here.  On the other hand, I won’t offer the disclaimer that the views presented here are not that of this author.  In fact, there are more than a few things we agree about. Alex has produced quite a number of documentary films over the years.  Some of his early work is a little on the rough side.  Alex has roots in cable access television, and some of the early pieces do have that look.

I have to say that his recent stuff is very well produced.  In fact, it’s give the work of Michael Moore a run for his money any day.  I suspect if Jones had the budget of Moore earlier in his career, the shift surely would have happened earlier.  No doubt there are some out there that may be offended in some way by this.  I dare say that even if you dislike the message, you can’t discount the production work.

Leave the first comment

Free WinX DVD Ripper Platinum (for a limited time so hurry)!

DVD extraction software

This actually seems to be a rather decent DVD ripper.  And for a while, it’s actually free!  Please note that we don’t encourage theft of copyrighted material.  I do however feel that I have a right to grab video from a DVD I already own, and put it on my iPhone.  It does indeed do just this.  

Free WinX DVD Ripper Platinum (for a limited time so hurry)! | Freebies | dotTech [.org].

Leave the first comment

Samson – Zoom – Q3


The Samson Zoom Q3

The new Samson – Zoom – Q3 has just recently been made available stateside.  Those who aren’t familiar with great Zoom audio recorders might think this is just another overpriced pocket video recorder.  They would be wrong.

The video is VGA level 640 x 480 just as with the iPhone, and most standard resolution pocket video recorders.  The difference is that this baby records audio at 24bit/48KHZ resolution!

What really urks me about the audio from not only most pocket cameras and phones, but even some pretty expensive camcorders, is that it is just aweful!  Tinny compressed sound will take the wind out of a good quality video any day.  I would always opt for better sound, even if the video is less than HD.

Leave the first comment

Sony Vegas and XVID (or DIVX) enconding with MP3 audio

Sony Vegas 9

Sony Vegas 9

I have banged my head against a wall over the audio problems with XVID encoding in Vegas for quite some time.  If you came across this article by the way of a search, you’ve probably read other articles about audio encoding issues with DIVX and XVID in Vegas.  You might have even tried a suggestion or two.  Perhaps you have even installed the LAME MP3 codec. Let me save you some time, and tell you that high bitrate MP3 audio is simply not supported in Vegas. 

Why not just use another video codec?  AVC is pretty widely supported after all.  The reason is simple.  XVID (or DIVX) with MP3 audio, is possibly the most efficient codec(s) for the AVI container ever developed.  Among other reasons, I have a Samsung bigscreen that will play these files directly.  A great solution for quick customer demos. 

There is a workaround.  It’s not ideal, but at least it wont cost you any more money.  First of all, you’ll need to grab a copy of VirtualDub.  If you’re not familiar with this tool, you should be.  Simply render your video in vegas with as an AVI video with the XVID codec.  Choose PCM lossless for the audio codec.  In the video menu, choose “Direct Stream Copy”.  In the audio menu, choose full processing mode, and then choose compression.  Choose “Lame MP3″ as the codec (you did install this earlier didn’t you?), and choose your preferred bitrate.  Then choose “save as AVI from the file menu.  That’s it!

In spite of this limitation, I’d still not trade Vegas for any other NLE.

2 comments so far, add yours

What else do you do?

I’ll bet I’m not the first videographer who as been asked this question.  It’s insulting on a few levels. It conveys the idea that you can’t possibly be making a living doing your job.  It also implys that you do something your client sees as play.  Yet they have not a clue how to handle even a simple edit job. 

This question comes from envy and ignorance.  Your client wishes they had a job like yours.  Asking this question indicates they have no idea how to reach that goal.

One comment so far, add another

The Panasonic P2 system

Pansonic P2 Cards

Pansonic P2 Cards

Many in the industry agree that the AG-HPX170 is an outstanding camera.  I noticed a local vendor has a rebate program that had me entertaining the thought of this cam once again.  After all, tapeless capture is definitely the future.  Perhaps however, this is not yet so for me.

A 32GB P2 card currently goes for around $600 or so.  This is about 20 times some of the other flash media.  Not a fair comparison perhaps, as these card are radically faster in transfer speed, more durable, can me written to more times, and so on.  $600 is pocket change in the film and television industry.  It’s still a pretty good chunk for the event video business.

I’d really love to hear if anyone is using these cams for event video coverage.  It occurs to me that you’d either (ideally) own a number of P2 cards, or constantly be dumping video to hard drives.  You’ll then probably want to back that drive up to some other media just to be safe, as you’ll have to soon wipe those P2 cards with your next event.  As for myself, I still kinda like the idea that I can shelve the tapes until I’m ready for them.

If you’re familiar with this camera, you might also know of Sony’s EX1.  A pretty attractive camera in a similar price ballpark.  It however can use Expresscard drives.  While they don’t have the specs of P2 cards, they can certainly be pretty fast.  This and at about 1/6th of the price too.  Hard to overlook for a budget shooter.

Leave the first comment
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.